Recently I participated in a webcast where we discussed the emergence of visual language and debated some ideas about what it is and what it is not.
Here's the description from the Vizthink blog:
VizThink Blog Podcast 11: What qualifies as visual language anyway?: "In the visual thinking community, we frequently use the term visual language. Some would say that it gets used pretty loosely. So, today we began that discussion with 3 experts in our field in order to begin to understand what visual language really means. Neil Cohn, Yuri Engelhardt, and Dave Gray joined us to discuss topics like:There are quite a few visual examples that support the discussion.
What is a visual language?
Does a visual language require a grammar?
What components make up a visual grammar?
Are certain forms of visualization a language and others not?"
I think the points where we disagreed are more intriguing than the points where we agreed. After you listen to the webcast I'll be interested to hear your thoughts.
Keep in touch! Sign up to get updates and occasional emails from me.
I came across your post blog and thought it was innovative. I showed some of your images to my class and offered it to my students as an option to represent their learning. One young lady decided to take me up on the offer.
That sounds great Bon! Can you share the result with us?
Post a Comment